Influence of Deformed Surface Diffuseness on Elastic Scattering Reactions Involving Actinide and Lanthanide Targets

Authors

  • M. Aygun Department of Physics, Bitlis Eren University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe66.2.105

Keywords:

nuclear surface diffuseness, deformation and orientation, elastic scattering, optical model

Abstract

The effect of the deformed surface diffuseness on the elastic scattering reactions with actinide and lanthanide targets is examined. The elastic scattering cross-sections are calculated by assuming the spherical structure for the projectiles and both spherical and deformed structures for the target nuclei. The theoretical calculations are performed by using spherical and deformed Broglie–Winther potentials for the real potential and the Woods–Saxon potential for the imaginary potential in the framework of the optical model. Finally, the effect of the angle dependence on the deformed surface diffuseness for two different orientation angles such as 0 = п/4 and 0 = п/2 is studied. All the theoretical results are compared with both one another and experimental data.

References

R.D. Woods, D.S. Saxon. Diffuse surface optical model for nucleon-nuclei scattering. Phys. Rev. 95, 577 (1954).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.577

J. B locki, J. Randrup, W.J. ' Swi¸atecki, C.F. Tsang. Proximity forces. Ann.Phys. (NY) 105, 427 (1977).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(77)90249-4

G.R. Satchler, W.G. Love. Folding model potentials from realistic interactions for heavy-ion scattering. Phys. Rep. 55, 183 (1979).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(79)90081-4

M. Aygun. Effects of proximity potentials on the cross-sections of 6,8He+65Cu halo fusion reactions. Ukr. J. Phys. 64, 363 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe64.5.363

M. Aygun. Analysis with SDHO and RMF density distributions of elastic scattering cross-sections of oxygen isotopes (16−18O) by various target nuclei. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 27, 1850055 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301318500556

M. Aygun. A comprehensive analysis of 9Li+70Zn fusion cross-section by using proximity potentials, temperature dependent density distributions and nuclear potentials. Rev. Mex. Fis. 65, 573 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.65.573

M. Aygun. A comparison of proximity potentials in the analysis of heavy-ion elastic cross-sections. Ukr. J. Phys. 63, 881 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe63.10.881

M. Aygun. Alternative Potentials Analyzing the Scattering cross-sections of 7,9,10,11,12,14Be Isotopes from a 12C

target: Proximity potentials. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 73, 1 (2018).

M. Aygun, Z. Aygun. A study on 7Li+120Sn quasi-elastic scattering. Turk. J. Phys. 40, 12 (2016).

https://doi.org/10.3906/fiz-1507-25

M. Aygun. The application of some nuclear potentials for quasielastic scattering data of the 11Li + 28Si reaction and its consequences. Turk. J. Phys. 42, 302 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.3906/fiz-1801-5

M. Aygun. Comparative analysis of proximity potentials to describe scattering of 13C projectile off 12C, 16O, 28Si and 208Pb nuclei. Rev. Mex. Fis. E 64, 149 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.64.149

S.A. Alavi, V. Dehghani. Investigation of heavy-ion fusion with deformed surface diffuseness: Actinide and lanthanide targets. Phys. Rev. C 95, 054602 (2017).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054602

S.A. Alavi, V. Dehghani. Alpha-induced reaction cross-section for Sm, U, Np targets: influence of hexadecapole

deformation and deformed surface diffuseness. Chin. Phys. C 41, 064104 (2017).

https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/064104

S. Dahmardeh, S.A. Alavi, V. Dehghani. Influence of deformed surface diffuseness on alpha decay half-lives of actinides and lanthanides. Nucl. Phys. A 963, 68 (2017).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.04.013

G.R. Satchler. Direct Nuclear Reactions (Oxford Univ. Press, 1983).

I.J. Thompson. Coupled reaction channels calculations in nuclear physics. Computer Phys. Rep. 7, 167 (1988).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7977(88)90005-6

W. Reisdorf. Heavy-ion reactions close to the Coulomb barrier. J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 20, 1297 (1994).

https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/20/9/004

G.L. Zhang, Y.J. Yao, M.F. Guo, M. Pan, G.X. Zhang, X.X. Liu. Comparative studies for different proximity potentials applied to large cluster radioactivity of nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 951, 86 (2016).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.03.039

P. M¨oller, A.J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, H. Sagawac. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM (2012). At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 109-110, 1 (2016).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002

H. Freiesleben, G.T. Rizzo, J.R. Huizenga. 6Li and 7Li induced fission of 232Th and 238U. Phys. Rev. C 12, 42 (1975).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.12.42

K. Zhao, X. Lu, Y. Cheng, Q. Li, M. Li, Z. Li, J. Guo, S. Li, Q. Zhang, X. Song, C. Jiang. Comparison of the elastic and inelastic scatterings between 152Sm + 12C and 148Nd + 160. Z. Phys. A 348, 95 (1994).

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01289595

G.J. Balster, P.C.N. Crouzen, P.B. Goldhoorn, R.H. Siemssen, H.W. Wilschut. Systematics of the 14N + 159Tb reaction between 6 and 22 MeV/u: (I). Inclusive data. Nucl. Phys. A 468, 93 (1987).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(87)90320-4

P.K. Sahu, R.K. Choudhury, D.C. Biswas, B.K. Nayak. Evidence for correlated pair transfer of valence nucleons in multiparticle stripping channels in the 18O+174Yb reaction. Phys. Rev. C 64, 014609 (2001).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.014609

A. Kumar, R.Tripathi, S. Sodaye, K.Sudarshan, P.K. Pujari. Angular distributions and cross-sections of projectile-like fragments in the 19F+159Tb reaction. Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 3 (2013).

https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2013-13003-2

Downloads

Published

2021-03-04

How to Cite

Aygun, M. (2021). Influence of Deformed Surface Diffuseness on Elastic Scattering Reactions Involving Actinide and Lanthanide Targets. Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 66(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe66.2.105

Issue

Section

Fields and elementary particles