Model of Chemotaxis in a Combined Environment

Authors

  • O.M. Vasyliev Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe70.12.852

Keywords:

chemotaxis model, bacterium, attractant, repellent, concentration, distribution

Abstract

We propose a model that describes the process of bacterial chemotaxis in a combined environment containing both an attractant and a repellent. The model is based on a system of differential equations that considers the effects of interaction of bacteria with both the attractant and the repellent. Within this approach framework, the chemotaxis effect turns out to be proportional to the concentration gradient of the corresponding substance (attractant or repellent). The model also revolves the saturation effect, when an increase in the concentration of the attractant or repellent reduces the bacterial response to the presence of a gradient in the concentration distribution of those substances. The chemotaxis sensitivity function has been used to analyze the heterogeneity of bacteria in the system. Its values are calculated at the system boundaries and, if there is an extremum in the bacterial distribution, at the extremum point. The dependence of the chemotaxis sensitivity function on the attractant and repellent concentrations has been analyzed. It is shown that this dependence is significantly nonlinear and differs qualitatively from similar dependences obtained earlier for systems containing only the attractant or the repellent.

References

1. H.C. Berg, D.A. Brown. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239, 500 (1972).

https://doi.org/10.1038/239500a0

2. H.C. Berg. E. coli in Motion (Springer, 2004).

https://doi.org/10.1007/b97370

3. T. Namba, M. Nishikawa, T. Shibata. The relation of signal transduction to the sensitivity and dynamic range of bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 103, 1390 (2012).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.034

4. J. Adler. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Science 153, 708 (1966).

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3737.708

5. J. Adler, G.L. Hazelbauer, M.M. Dahl. Chemotaxis toward sugars in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 115, 824 (1973).

https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.115.3.824-847.1973

6. T. Sagawa, Y. Kikuchi, Y. Inoue, H. Takahashi, T. Muraoka, K. Kinbara, A. Ishijima, H. Fukuoka. Single-cell E. coli response to an instantaneously applied chemotactic signal. Biophys. J. 10, 730 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.017

7. J. Adler. Chemoreceptors in bacteria. Science 166, 1588 (1969).

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.166.3913.1588

8. E.F. Keller, L.A. Segel. Travelling bands of chemotactic bacteria: A theoretical analysis. J Theor. Biology 30, 235 (1971).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90051-8

9. E. Keller, L. Segel. Model for chemotaxis. J. Theor. Biology 30, 225 (1971).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90050-6

10. R. Lapidus, R. Schiller. A mathematical model for bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 14, 825 (1974).

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85952-7

11. R. Lapidus, R. Schiller. Model for the chemotactic response of a bacterial population. Biophys. J. 16, 779 (1976).

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85728-1

12. J.D. Murray. Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction (Springer, 2007).

13. M.J. Tindall, S.K. Porter, P.K. Maini, G. Gaglia, J.P. Armitage. Overview of mathematical approaches used to model bacterial chemotaxis. II: Bacterial populations. Bull. Math. Biol. 70, 1570 (2008).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-008-9322-5

14. J. Zhuang, G. Wei, R.W. Carlsen, M.R. Edwards, R. Marculescu, P. Bogdan, M. Sitti. Analytical modeling and experimental characterization of chemotaxis in Serratia marcescens. Phys. Rev. E 89, 052704 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052704

15. O.M. Vasiliev, D.E. Sakovich. Modeling of bacterial chemotaxis in a one-dimensional system. J. Phys. Res. 19 (1/2), 1801 (2015).

https://doi.org/10.30970/jps.19.1801

16. D.V. Bogdanov, O.M. Vasiliev. Chemotaxis sensitivity function for a two-dimensional system with radial symmetry. J. Phys. Res. 21, 3801 (2017).

https://doi.org/10.30970/jps.21.3801

17. A.N. Vasilev. Analytical approach for calculating the chemotaxis sensitivity function. Ukr. J. Phys. 63, 255 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe63.3.255

18. O.M. Vasilev, V.O. Karpenko. Modeling of bacterial chemotaxis in a medium with a repellent. Ukr. J. Phys. 63, 802 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe63.9.802

19. A.N. Vasilev. Peculiarities of bacterial chemotaxis in a cylindrical pore. Ukr. J. Phys. 64, 137 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe64.2.137

20. O.M. Vasilev, B.E. Sergushev. Peculiarities of bacterial chemotaxis in a cylindrical pore. Ukr. J. Phys. 64 (2), 135 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe64.2.137

21. O.M. Vasiliev, A.O. Slobodyanyuk. Chemotaxis sensitivity function for a system with spherical geometry. Ukr. J. Phys. 68 (7), 458 (2023).

22. D.A. Gavryushenko, K.V. Cherevko, V.M. Sysoev. The influence of the chemical reactions on the diffusion phenomena in the cylindrical systems bounded with the membranes. J. Mol. Liq. 127, 1 (2006).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2006.03.018

23. K.V. Cherevko, D.A. Gavryushenko, O.V. Korobko, V.M. Sysoev. Entropy production in the diffusion of a Margules solution in a flat-parallel pore. Ukr. J. Phys. 58, 10 (2013).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe58.10.0988

24. K.V. Cherevko, D.A. Gavryushenko, L.A. Bulavin. Entropy production in a model biological system with facilitated diffusion. Ukr. J. Phys. 66, 8 (2021).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe66.8.714

25. O.V. Kulish, A.N. Vasilev. Modeling the nerve impulse transmission in a synaptic cleft. J. Phys. Stud. 23, 1801 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.30970/jps.23.1801

26. O.M. Vasiliev, O.V. Kulish. Modeling the process of postsynaptic membrane deactivation. Ukr. J. Phys. 63, 919 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe63.10.919

27. A.N. Vasilev, A.V. Chalyi. Cooperative operation mode of a synaptic channel. Ukr. J. Phys. 54, 1183 (2009).

28. A.V. Chalyi, A.N. Vasilev, E.V. Zaitseva. Synaptic transmission as a cooperative phenomenon in confined systems. Cond. Matter Phys. 20 (1), 13804 (2017).

https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.20.13804

29. R. Lapidus, R. Schiller. Bacterial chemotaxis in a fixed attractant gradient. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 215 (1975).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90112-5

30. M. Widman, D. Emerson, C. Chiu, R. Worden. Modelling microbial chemotaxis in a diffusion gradient chamber. Biotech. Bioeng. 55, 191 (1997).

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970705)55:1<191::AID-BIT20>3.0.CO;2-O

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

Vasyliev, O. (2025). Model of Chemotaxis in a Combined Environment. Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 70(12), 852. https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe70.12.852

Issue

Section

Physics of liquids and liquid systems, biophysics and medical physics

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.