Properties of Graphene Flakes Obtained by Treating Graphite with Ultrasound

Authors

  • V. O. Yukhymchuk V.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine
  • M. Ya. Valakh V.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine
  • O. M. Hreshchuk V.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine
  • Ye. O. Havrylyuk V.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine
  • I. B. Yanchuk V.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine
  • A. V. Yefanov V.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine, Nanomedtech LLC
  • R. N. Arif Electronic Engineering Division, School of Engineering & Applied Science
  • A. G. Rozhin Electronic Engineering Division, School of Engineering & Applied Science
  • M. A. Skoryk Nanomedtech LLC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe62.05.0432

Keywords:

graphene, Raman spectroscopy, ultrasound treatment, vacancy and edge defects, scanning electron microscopy

Abstract

A possibility to obtain graphene and graphene layers with the help of the ultrasound (US) treatment of pyrolytic graphite in an N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) solution has been demonstrated. Raman spectroscopy is confirmed to be an effective method for monitoring the graphite transformation into graphene. By varying the time of the ultrasonic treatment of pyrolytic graphite in the NMP solution, optimum regimes for the fabrication of graphene flakes with various numbers of layers are determined. In particular, the US treatment for 5 h is shown to be sufficient for producing a colloidal solution of graphene flakes, most of which are single-layered. It is shown that the longer US treatment results in larger intensities of Raman bands D and D′, which testifies to a larger number of defects in the graphene layers. The average distances between defects are estimated for various times of US treatment. The influence of vacancy and edge defects on the intensity band ratio lD/lD′ is analyzed. Vacancies are found to be the prevailing type of defects in the graphene flakes.

References

K.S. Novoselov, V.I. Fal’ko, L. Colombo, P.R. Gellert, M.G. Schwab, K. Kim. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192 (2012).

X. Yang, C. Cheng, D. Sichao, Y. Jianyi, Y. Bin, L. Jack, Y. Wenyan, L. Erping, D. Shurong, Y. Peide, D. Xiangfeng. Contacts between two- and three-dimensional materials: Properties of Graphene Flakes Ohmic,Schottky, and heterojunctions. ACS Nano 10, 4895 (2016).

S. Chen, S. Zhimei, L. Feng. Strain engineering of graphene: A review. Nanoscale 8, 3207 (2016).

A.N. Morozovska, E.A. Eliseev, M.V. Strikha. Ballistic conductivity of graphene channel with junction on ferroelectric domain wall. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 232902 (2016).

K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, A.A. Firsov. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666 (2004).

A.A. Tahir, H. Ullah, P. Sudhagar, M.A.M. Teridi, A. Devadoss, S. Sundaram. The application of graphene and its derivatives to energy conversion, storage, and environmental and biosensing devices. Chem. Rec. 16, 1591 (2016).

Wen Yang, Mei Ni, Xin Ren, Yafen Tian, Ning Li, Yuefeng Su, Xiaoling Zhang. Graphene in supercapacitor applications. Curr. Opin. Coll. Interface Sci. 20, 416 (2015).

A. Bablich, S. Kataria, M.C. Lemme. Graphene and twodimensional materials for optoelectronic applications. Electronics 5, 13 (2016).

Z. Chengzhou, D. Dan, L. Yuehe. Graphene-like 2D nanomaterial-based biointerfaces for biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 89, 43 (2017).

K. Leilei, C. Jiayu, Z. Hongtao, X. Ping, S. Mengtao. Recent progress in the applications of graphene in surfaceenhanced Raman scattering and plasmon-induced catalytic reactions. Mater. Chem. C 3, 9024 (2015).

B.F. Machado, P. Serp. Graphene-based materials for catalysis. Catalys. Sci. Technol. 2, 54 (2012).

E. Sadeghinezhad, M. Mehrali, R. Saidur, M. Mehrali, S.T. Latibari, A.R. Akhiani, H.S.C. Metselaar. A comprehensive review on graphene nanofluids: recent research, development and applications. Ener. Conv. Manag. 111, 466 (2016).

F. Schwierz. Graphene transistors. Nature Nanotech. 5, 487 (2010).

A. Das, B. Chakraborty, A.K. Sood. Raman spectroscopy of graphene on different substrates and influence of defects. Bull. Mater. Sci. 31, 579 (2008).

A. Guermoune, T. Chari, F. Popescu, S.S. Sabri, J. Guillemette, H.S. Skulason, T. Szkopek, M. Siaj. Chemical vapor deposition synthesis of graphene on copper with methanol, ethanol, and propanol precursors. Carbon 49, 4204 (2011).

N. Camara, J.-R. Huntzinger, G. Rius, A. Tiberj, N. Mestres, F. P´erez-Murano, P. Godignon, J. Camassel. Anisotropic growth of long isolated graphene ribbons on the C face of graphite-capped 6H-SiC. Phys. Rev. B 80, 125410 (2009).

M. Valakh, V. Kiselov, V. Yukhymchuk, V. Dzhagan, A. Efanov, M. Tryus, A. Belyaev, D.R.T. Zahn. Freestanding graphene monolayers in carbon-based composite obtained from SiC: Raman diagnostics. Phys. Status Solidi A 211, 1674 (2014).

K.R. Paton et al. Scalable production of large quantities of defect-free few-layer graphene by shear exfoliation in liquids. Nature Mater. 13, 624 (2014).

A.C. Ferrari, J. Robertson. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 61, 14095 (2000).

L.M. Malard, M.A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 473, 51 (2009).

F. Tuinstra, J.L. Koenig. Raman spectrum of graphite. J. Chem. Phys. 53,1126 (1970).

S. Piscanec, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, A.C. Ferrari, J. Robertson. Kohn anomalies and electron-phonon interaction in graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 185503 (2004).

R. Beams, L.G. Cancado, L. Novotny. Raman characterization of defects and dopants in graphene. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 083002 (2015).

E.H. Martins Ferreira, M.V.O. Moutinho, F. Stavale, M.M. Lucchese, R.B. Capaz, C.A. Achete, A. Jorio. Evolution of the Raman spectra from single-, few-, and manylayer graphene with increasing disorder. Phys. Rev. B 82, 125429 (2010).

C. Casiraghi, S. Pisana, K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, A.C. Ferrari. Raman fingerprint of charged impurities in graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 233108 (2007).

M.M. Lucchese, F. Stavale, E.H. Martins Ferreira, C. Vilani, M.V.O. Moutinho, R.B. Capaz, C.A. Achete, A. Jorio. Quantifying ion-induced defects and Raman relaxation length in graphene. Carbon 48, 1592 (2010).

L.G. Cancado, A. Jorio, E. H. Martins Ferreira, F. Stavale, C.A. Achete, R.B. Capaz, M.V.O. Moutinho, A. Lombardo, T.S. Kulmala, A.C. Ferrari. Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett. 11, 3190 (2011).

L.G. Cancado, K. Takai, T. Enoki, M. Endo, Y.A. Kim, H. Mizusaki et al. General equation for the determination of the crystallite size of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 163106 (2006).

L.G. Cancado, M.A. Pimenta, B.R.A. Neves, M.S.S. Dantas, A. Jorio. Influence of the atomic structure on the Raman spectra of graphite edges. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 247401 (2004).

C. Casiraghi, A. Hartschuh, H. Qian, S. Piscanec, C. Georgi, A. Fasoli, K.S. Novoselov, D.M. Basko, A.C. Ferrari. Raman spectroscopy of graphene edges. Nano Lett. 9, 1433 (2009).

A. Eckmann, A. Felten, A. Mishchenko, L. Britnell, R. Krupke, K.S. Novoselov, C. Casiraghi. Probing the nature of defects in graphene by Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 12, 3925 (2012).

F. Banhart, J. Kotakoski, A.V. Krasheninnikov. Structural defects in graphene. ACS Nano 5, 26(2011).

S.P. Lonkar, A.A. Abdala. Applications of graphene in catalysis. Thermodyn. Catalys. 5 (2), 1 (2014).

Downloads

Published

2018-12-15

Issue

Section

Solid matter

How to Cite

Properties of Graphene Flakes Obtained by Treating Graphite with Ultrasound. (2018). Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 62(5), 432. https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe62.05.0432

Most read articles by the same author(s)