Cross Sections of Elastic Scattering for Systems 16O + 42Ca, 16O + 48Ca within the Modified Thomas–Fermi Method with Taking the Repulsion Core into Account
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe70.4.229Keywords:
Thomas–Fermi method, reactions 16O + 42Ca and 16O + 48CaAbstract
Within the framework of the modified Thomas–Fermi method, the distribution densities of nucleons and nucleus-nucleus interaction potentials for the reactions 16O + 42Ca and 16O + 48Ca have been calculated. Besides, all contributions up to the second-order terms in ħ in the quasiclassical expansion of the kinetic energy are taken into account, and Skyrme forces, which depend on density, are used as the nucleon-nucleon interaction. A convenient parametrization of the potentials between nuclei has been obtained, allowing them to be represented in analytic form. Using the obtained potentials, the elastic scattering cross-sections are calculated, which agree well with the available experimental data.
References
1. R. Bass. Nuclear Reactions with Heavy Ion (SpringerVerlag, 1980).
2. G.R. Satchler. Direct Nuclear Reactions (Clarendon Press, 1983) [ISBN-13: 978-0198512691, ISBN-10: 0198512694].
3. P. Frobrich, R. Lipperheide. Theory of Nuclear Reactions (Clarendon Press, 1996) [ISBN: 9780198537830].
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198537830.001.0001
4. V.Yu. Denisov, V.A. Plujko. Problems of Nuclear Physics and Physics of Nuclear Reactions (Kyiv University Publ. Center, 2013) (in Russian) [ISBN: 978-966-439-673-5].
5. J. Blocki, J. Randrup, W.J. Swiatecki, C.F. Tsang. Proximity forces. Ann. Phys. 105, 427 (1977).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(77)90249-4
6. W.D. Myers, W.J. Swiatecki. Nucleus-nucleus proximity potential and superheavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 62, 044610 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.044610
7. V.Yu. Denisov. Nucleus-nucleus potential with shell-correction contribution and deep sub-barrier fusion of heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 89 (4), 044604 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044604
8. V.Yu. Denisov, V.A. Nesterov. Potential of interaction between nuclei and nucleon-density distribution in nuclei. Phys. Atom. Nucl. 69, 1472 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778806090067
9. V.Yu. Denisov. Interaction potential between heavy ions. Phys. Lett. B 526, 315 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01513-1
10. H.J. Krappe, J.R. Nix, A.J. Sierk. Unified nuclear potential for heavy-ion elastic scattering, fusion, fission, and ground state masses and deformations. Phys. Rev. C 20, 992 (1979).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.20.992
11. V.Yu. Denisov, W. Norenberg. Entrance channel potentials in the synthesis of the heaviest nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. A 15, 375 (2002).
https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10039-3
12. V.Yu. Denisov. Nucleus-nucleus potential with shell-correction contribution. Phys. Rev. C 91, 024603 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024603
13. A. Winther. Dissipation, polarization and fluctuation in grazing heavy-ion collisions and the boundary to the chaotic regime. Nucl. Phys. A 594, 203 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(95)00374-A
14. V.Yu. Denisov, O.I. Davidovskaya. Repulsive core potential and elastic heavy-ion collisions. Yad. Fiz. 73, 429 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778810030026
15. V.Yu. Denisov, O.I. Davidovskaya. Repulsive core potential and elastic heavy-ion collisions. Ukr. J. Phys. 54, 669 (2009).
16. K.A. Brueckner, J.R. Buchler, M.M. Kelly. New theoretical approach to nuclear heavy-ion scattering. Phys. Rev. C 173, 944 (1968).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.173.944
17. J. Fleckner, U. Mosel. Antisymmetrization effects in heavy ion potentials. Nucl. Phys. A 277, 170 (1977).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(77)90268-8
18. O.I. Davidovskaya, V.Yu. Denisov, V.A. Nesterov. Nucleus-nucleus potential with repulsive core and elastic scattering. Part 1. Nucleus-nucleus interaction potential. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy. 11 (1), 25 (2010).
19. O.I. Davidovskaya, V.Yu. Denisov, V.A. Nesterov. Nucleus-nucleus potential with repulsive core and elastic scattering. Part 2. The elastic scattering cross sections with and without core. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy. 11 (1), 33 (2010).
20. V.Yu. Denisov, O.I. Davidovskaya. Elastic scattering of heavy ions and nucleus-nucleus potential with a repulsive core. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 74, 611 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873810040325
21. O.I. Davidovskaya, V.Yu. Denisov, V.A. Nesterov. Effective nucleus-nucleus potential with the contribution of the kinetic energy of nucleons, and the cross-sections of elastic scattering and subbarrier fusion. Ukr. J. Phys. 62, 473 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe62.06.0473
22. V.A. Nesterov. Effect of the Pauli exclusion principle and the polarization of nuclei on the potential of their interaction for the example of the 16O + 16O system. Phys. At. Nucl. 76, 577 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377881304008X
23. V.Yu. Denisov, O.I. Davidovskaya. Elastic 16O + 16O scattering and nucleus-nucleus potential with a repulsive core. Ukr. J. Phys. 55, 861 (2010).
24. O.I. Davydovska, V.Yu. Denisov, V.O. Nesterov. Nucleusnucleus potential, the elastic scattering and subbarrier fusion cross sections for the system 40Ca + 40Ca. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy. 19, 203 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2018.03.203
25. O.I. Davydovska, V.Yu. Denisov, V.A. Nesterov. Comparison of the nucleus-nucleus potential evaluated in the double-folding and energy density approximations and the cross-sections of elastic scattering and fusion of heavy ions. Nucl. Phys. A 989, 214 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.06.004
26. V.O. Nesterov, O.I. Davydovska, V.Yu. Denisov. Calculation of the cross-sections of sub-barrier fusion and elastic scattering of heavy ions using the modified Thomas-Fermi approach with the Skyrme force. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy. 20 (4), 349 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2019.04.349
27. P. Ring, P. Schuck. The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag, 1980).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61852-9
28. M. Brack, C. Guet, H.B. Hakanson. Self-consistent semiclassical description of average nuclear properties - a link between microscopic and macroscopic models. Phys. Rep. 123, 275 (1985).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(86)90078-5
29. M. Brack, R.K. Bhaduri. Semiclassical Physics (AddisonWesley Publ. Co, 1997) [ISBN-10: 0813340845; ISBN-13 : 978-0813340845].
30. V.M. Strutinsky, A.G. Magner, V.Yu. Denisov. Density distributions in nuclei. Z. Phys. A 322, 149 (1985).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01412028
31. J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, P.G. Reinhard. Pairing interaction and self-consistent densities in neutron-rich nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 693, 361 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00993-9
32. D. Vautherin, D.M. Brink. Hartree-Fock calculations with Skyrme's interaction. I. Spherical nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 5, 626 (1972).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.5.626
33. J. Bartel, P. Quentin, M. Brack, C. Guet, H.B. Hakansson. Towards a better parametrization of Skyrme-like effective forces: A critical study of the SkM force. Nucl. Phys. A 386, 79 (1982).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(82)90403-1
34. S.A. Fayans, S.V. Tolokonnikov, E.L. Trykov, D. Zawischac. Nuclear isotope shifts within the local energy-density functional approach. Nucl. Phys. A 676, 49 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00192-5
35. J.W. Negele. The mean-field theory of nuclear structure and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 913 (1982).
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.54.913
36. T.H.R. Skyrme. The effective nuclear potential. Nucl. Phys. 9, 615 (1959).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(58)90345-6
37. H. Feshbach. The optical model and its justification. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 8, 49 (1958).
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.08.120158.000405
38. H. Friedrich, L.F. Canto. Effective nucleus-nucleus potentials derived from the generator coordinate method. Nucl. Phys. A 291, 249 (1977).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(77)90210-X
39. O.I. Davydovska, V.A. Nesterov, V.Yu. Denisov. The nucleus-nucleus potential within the extended Thomas-Fermi method and the cross-sections of subbarrier fusion and elastic scattering for the systems 16O + 58,60,62,64Ni. Nucl. Phys. A 1002, 121994 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121994
40. J. Orloff, W.W. Daehnick. Elastic scattering of 16O by 48Ti, 40Ca, 27Al, 12C, 7Li, and 6Li. Phys. Rev. C 3, 430 (1971).
41. Y. Eisen, H.T. Fortune, W. Henning, D.G. Kovar, S. Vigdor, B. Zeidman Two-nucleon transfer reactions induced by 16O on 42Ca and 48Ca. Phys. Rev. C 13, 699 (1976).
42. K.E. Rehm, W. Henning, J.R. Erskine, D.G. Kovar, M.H. Macfarlane, S.C. Pieper, M. Rhoades-Brown. Inelastic scattering of 16O from 40,42,44,48Ca. Phys. Rev. C 25, 1915 (1982).
43. K.O. Groeneveld, L. Meyer-Sch¨utzmeister, A. Richter, U. Strohbusch. Backward - angle elastic scattering of 16O on 40Ca and 48Ca. Phys. Rev. C 6, 805 (1972).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Agreement
License to Publish the Paper
Kyiv, Ukraine
The corresponding author and the co-authors (hereon referred to as the Author(s)) of the paper being submitted to the Ukrainian Journal of Physics (hereon referred to as the Paper) from one side and the Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, represented by its Director (hereon referred to as the Publisher) from the other side have come to the following Agreement:
1. Subject of the Agreement.
The Author(s) grant(s) the Publisher the free non-exclusive right to use the Paper (of scientific, technical, or any other content) according to the terms and conditions defined by this Agreement.
2. The ways of using the Paper.
2.1. The Author(s) grant(s) the Publisher the right to use the Paper as follows.
2.1.1. To publish the Paper in the Ukrainian Journal of Physics (hereon referred to as the Journal) in original language and translated into English (the copy of the Paper approved by the Author(s) and the Publisher and accepted for publication is a constitutive part of this License Agreement).
2.1.2. To edit, adapt, and correct the Paper by approval of the Author(s).
2.1.3. To translate the Paper in the case when the Paper is written in a language different from that adopted in the Journal.
2.2. If the Author(s) has(ve) an intent to use the Paper in any other way, e.g., to publish the translated version of the Paper (except for the case defined by Section 2.1.3 of this Agreement), to post the full Paper or any its part on the web, to publish the Paper in any other editions, to include the Paper or any its part in other collections, anthologies, encyclopaedias, etc., the Author(s) should get a written permission from the Publisher.
3. License territory.
The Author(s) grant(s) the Publisher the right to use the Paper as regulated by sections 2.1.1–2.1.3 of this Agreement on the territory of Ukraine and to distribute the Paper as indispensable part of the Journal on the territory of Ukraine and other countries by means of subscription, sales, and free transfer to a third party.
4. Duration.
4.1. This Agreement is valid starting from the date of signature and acts for the entire period of the existence of the Journal.
5. Loyalty.
5.1. The Author(s) warrant(s) the Publisher that:
– he/she is the true author (co-author) of the Paper;
– copyright on the Paper was not transferred to any other party;
– the Paper has never been published before and will not be published in any other media before it is published by the Publisher (see also section 2.2);
– the Author(s) do(es) not violate any intellectual property right of other parties. If the Paper includes some materials of other parties, except for citations whose length is regulated by the scientific, informational, or critical character of the Paper, the use of such materials is in compliance with the regulations of the international law and the law of Ukraine.
6. Requisites and signatures of the Parties.
Publisher: Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Address: Ukraine, Kyiv, Metrolohichna Str. 14-b.
Author: Electronic signature on behalf and with endorsement of all co-authors.
.png){kind=small}
