Minisuperspace Quantum Cosmology in the Madelung–Bohm Formalism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe70.4.217

Keywords:

quantum theory, hydrodynamics, cosmology, geometrodynamics

Abstract

An analogy between non-relativistic quantum mechanics in the Madelung formulation and quantum geometrodynamics in the case of the maximally symmetric space is drawn. The equations equivalent to the continuity equation and the hydrodynamic Euler equation describing the evolution of the velocity introduced for the case of hypothetical fluid flow characterizing the cosmological system are obtained. It is shown that the perfect nature of the fluid is broken by the quantum Bohm potential. The quantum potential is calculated in the semi-classical approximation for different forces acting in the system both in standard quantum mechanics and in the minisuperspace model of quantum geometrodynamics. The explicit dependences of the cosmic scale factor on the conformal time, which account for the quantum additive, are found for the empty space with spatial curvature and for a spatially flat universe with dust and radiation.

References

1. E. Madelung. Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form. Zeit. f. Phys. 40, 322 (1927).

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400372

2. E. Schr¨odinger. Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. Ann. d. Phys. 81, 109 (1926).

https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19263861802

3. D. Bohm. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of "hidden" variables. I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166

4. D. Bohm. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of "hidden" variables. II. Phys. Rev. 85, 180 (1952).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.180

5. T. Takabayasi. On the formulation of quantum mechanics associated with classical pictures. Prog. Theor. Phys. 8, 143 (1952).

https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.8.143

6. O. Halpern. A proposed re-interpretation of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. 87, 389 (1952).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.87.389

7. D. Bohm. Reply to a criticism of a casual re-interpretation of the quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 87, 389 (1952).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.87.389.2

8. D. Bohm. Comments on an article of Takabayasi concerning the formulation of quantum mechanics with classical pictures. Prog. Theor. Phys. 9, 273 (1953).

https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.9.273

9. D. Bohm, J.P. Vigier. Model of the causal interpretation of quantum theory in terms of a fluid with irregular fluctuations. Phys. Rev. 96, 208 (1954).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.96.208

10. H. Freistadt. The causal formulation of quantum mechanics of particles (the theory of De Broglie, Bohm and Takabayasi). Nuovo Cimento 5, 1 (1957).

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744313

11. P.A.M. Dirac. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1958).

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3062610

12. M. Berry. Time-independent. paraxial and time-dependent Madelung trajectories near zeros. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57, 025201 (2024).

https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad10f2

13. R.A. Leacock, M.J. Padgett. Hamilton-Jacobi theory and the quantum action variable. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 3 (1983).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.3

14. R.A. Leacock, M.J. Padgett. Hamilton-Jacobi/actionangle quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. D 28, 2491 (1983).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2491

15. C.-C. Chou, R.E. Wyatt. Computational method for the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation: One-dimensional scattering problems. Phys. Rev. E 74, 066702 (2006).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.066702

16. C.-C. Chou, R.E. Wyatt. Computational method for the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation: Bound states in one dimension. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 174103 (2006).

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2358988

17. A. Bouda, A.M. Meziane. The three-dimensional quantum Hamilton-Jacobi equation and microstates. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45, 1278 (2006).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9150-z

18. A. Bouda. The quantum reduced action in higher dimensions. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 913 (2009).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9864-1

19. N. Rosen. The relation between classical and quantum mechanics. Am. J. Phys. 32, 597 (1964).

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1970870

20. G.E. Bowman. On the classical limit in Bohm's theory. Found. Phys. 35, 605 (2005).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-2013-7

21. F. Gay-Balmaz, C. Tronci. Madelung transform and probability densities in hybrid quantum-classical dynamics. Nonlinearity 33 5383 (2020). arXiv:1907.06624.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/aba233

22. S. Sonego. Interpretation of the hydrodynamical formalism of quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 21 1135 (1991).

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00734264

23. E. Heifetz, R. Tsekov, E. Cohen, Z. Nussinov. On entropy production in the Madelung fluid and the role of Bohm's potential in classical diffusion. Found. Phys. 46, 815 (2016).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0003-1

24. E. Heifetz, E. Cohen. Toward a thermo-hydrodynamic like description of Schr¨odinger equation via the Madelung formulation and Fisher information. Found. Phys. 45, 1514 (2015).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9926-1

25. M. Reddiger. The Madelung picture as a foundation of geometric quantum theory. Found. Phys. 47, 1317 (2017).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-017-0112-5

26. M. Reddiger, B. Poirier. Towards a mathematical theory of the Madelung equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 193001 (2023).

https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/acc7db

27. T.C. Wallstrom. Inequivalence between the Schr¨odinger equation and the Madelung hydrodynamic equations. Phys. Rev. A 49, 1613 (1994).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1613

28. P.A.M. Dirac. Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 133 60 (1931).

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1931.0130

29. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz. Quantum Mechanics. Course of Theoretical Physics (Pergamon Press, 1965), Vol. 3.

30. V.E. Kuzmichev, V.V Kuzmichev. The expanding Universe: Change of regime. Ukr. J. Phys. 60, 664 (2015).

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe60.07.0664

31. V.E. Kuzmichev, V.V Kuzmichev. The Big Bang quantum cosmology: The matter-energy production epoch. Acta Phys. Pol. B 39, 979 (2008), arXiv:0712.0464.

32. V.E. Kuzmichev, V.V Kuzmichev. Quantum corrections to the dynamics of the expanding universe. Acta Phys. Pol. B 44, 2051 (2013), arXiv:1307.2383.

https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.44.2051

33. V.E. Kuzmichev, V.V Kuzmichev. The matter-energy intensity distribution in a quantum gravitational system. Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 5(2), 245 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-017-0115-0

34. V.E. Kuzmichev, V.V Kuzmichev. The Hubble tension from the standpoint of quantum cosmology. Eur. J. Phys. C 84, 121 (2024), arXiv:2211.16394.

https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12490-6

35. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, C.W. Misner. The dynamics of general relativity, in: Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, ed. L. Witten (Wiley, 1962). arXiv:grqc/0405109.

36. K.V. Kuchaˇr, C.G. Torre. Gaussian reference fluid and interpretation of quantum geometrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 43, 419 (1991).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.419

37. J.B. Brown, D. Marolf. On relativistic material reference systems. Phys. Rev. D 53, 1835 (1996). arXiv:grqc/9509026.

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.1835

38. C. Philippidis, C. Dewdney, B.J. Hiley. Quantum interference and the quantum potential. Nuov. Cim. B 52, 15 (1979).

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743566

Published

2025-04-25

Issue

Section

Fields and elementary particles

How to Cite

Minisuperspace Quantum Cosmology in the Madelung–Bohm Formalism. (2025). Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 70(4), 217. https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe70.4.217

Most read articles by the same author(s)