Solar Activity and Cosmic Ray Intensity Variation with Geomagnetic Activity during 1996–2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe69.4.257Keywords:
cosmic ray, geomagnetic disturbance index, solar activity cycleAbstract
The average features of diurnal variation have been observed to change with different phases of the solar cycle, with the variance being substantially bigger at higher energies. The events were classified on the basis of different phases of solar cycles, i.e., the minimum solar activity time period, the maximum solar activity time period, and the declining phase of solar cycle. This research looks at the observed results and the influence of solar variability on cosmic rays and the geomagnetic field from 1996 to 2022. The occasional group includes a Forbush effect decline, transitory decrease, and a ground level enhancement (GLE). The 11-year fluctuation in Galactic Cosmic Rays is also known as the long-term variation, whereas the Forbush effect reduction is known as short-term variation. We investigated the long-term change in the cosmic ray intensity and its relationship to the number of Sun spots (Rz), solar wind speed (
References
R. M. Jacklyn. The apparent sidereal and anti-sidereal daily variations of cosmic ray intensity. Nuovo Cimento. 24, 1034 (1962).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02754289
S.P. Agrawal, L.T. Lenzerolti, D. Venketnsan, E.J. Hansen. Solar polar coronal holes and galactic cosmic ray intensities. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 6845 (1980).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA085iA12p06845
S.P. Agrawal, P.K. Shrivastava, R.P. Shukla. Study of cosmic ray daily variations during quiet periods at neutron monitor energies. In: Proceedings of 24th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Calgary (Canada), July 19-30 (1993).
S.P. Agrawal. Solar cycle variations of cosmic ray intensity and large-scale structure of the heliosphere. Space sci. Rev. 34, 127 (1983).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194622
H.S. Ahluwalia, C. Lopate. Long term residual modulation of lower energy galactic cosmic rays. In: Proceeding of 27th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Hamburg, Germany, August 8-15 (2001).
O.N. Bakare, V.U. Chukwuma. Relationship Dst and solar wind conditions during intense geomagnetic storms. Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics. 39, 150 (2010).
J. Chum, M. Koll'arik, I. Kolmasov'a, L. Ronald, J. Rusz, D. Saxonbergova, I. Strharsky. Influence of solar wind on secondary cosmic rays and atmospheric electricity front. Earth Sci. 9, 671801 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.671801
Badruddin, D. Venkatesan, A. G. Ananth. Types of interplanetary shocks and forbush decreases. Sol. Phys. 134, 395 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152655
H.V. Cane. Coronal mass ejections and forbush decreases. Space Sci. Rev. 93, 55 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1187-6_4
M. Calisto, E. Usoskin, Rozanov, T. Peter. Influence of galactic cosmic rays on atmospheric composition and dynamics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 4547 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4547-2011
N.R. Draper, H. Smith. Applied Regression Analysis (Wiley, 1998).
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625590
S.E. Forbush. World-wide cosmic-ray variations 1937-52. J. Geophys. Res. 59, 525 (1954).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ059i004p00525
S.E. Forbush. Large increase of cosmic-ray intensity following solar flare on February 23, 1956. J. Geophys. Res. 62, 169 (1957).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ062i001p00169
S.E. Forbush. Cosmic-ray intensity variations during two solar cycles. J. Geophys. Res. 3, 6510669 (1958).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ063i004p00651
M. Gupta, V.K. Mishra, A.P. Mishra. Long-term modulation of cosmic ray intensity in relation to sunspot numbers and tilt angle. J. Astrophys. Astron. 27, 455 (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02709371
V. Gupta, Badruddin. High-speed solar wind streams during 1996-2007: Sources, statistical distribution, and plasma/field properties. Sol. Phys. 264, 165 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9554-z
J. K'ota, J.R. Jokipii. The role of corotating interaction regions in cosmic-ray modulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 1797 (1991).
https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL02307
J.A. Lockwood. Forbush decreases in the cosmic radiation. Space Sci. Rev. 12, 658 (1971).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173346
J.A. Lockwood. An investigation of the Forbush decreases in the cosmic radiation. J. Geophys. Res. 65, 3859 (1960).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ065i012p03859
S. Mori. Cosmic-ray modulation ground-based observations. Il Nuovo Cimento C 19, 791 (1996).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506669
M. Jakimiec, M. Storini, A. Antalova. Multivariate daily sequence analyses of GCR/solar X-ray parameters. Advances in Space Res. 20, 111 (1997).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00491-2
A. Prasad, S. Roy, K. Ghosh, S.C. Panja, S.N. Patra. Investigation of hemispherical variations of soft X-ray solar flares during solar cycles 21 to 24. Sol. Sys.t Res. 55, 169 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094621020052
R. Baral, B. Adhikari, A. Calabia, M. Shah, R.K. Mishra, A. Silwal, S. Bohara, R. Manandhar. Spectral features of Forbush Decreases during geomagnetic storms. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 242, 105981 (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105981
S. Singh, D. Shrivastava, A.P. Mishra. Effect of solar and interplanetary disturbances on space weather. Indian J. Sci. Res. 3, 121 (2012)
S. Kaushik, P. Shrivastava. Influence of magnetic clouds on interplanetary features. Indian J. Phys. 74, 159 (2000).
S. Singh, A.P. Mishra. Cosmic ray intensity increases during high solar activity period for the solar cycles 22 and 23. Indian J. Phys. 93, 139 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-018-1284-3
S. Singh, A.P. Mishra. interaction of solar plasma nearearth with reference to geomagnetic storms during maxima of solar cycle 24. Indian J. Phys. 89, 1227 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-015-0703-y
S. O. Ifedili. Forbush decrease of June 8, 1969: Causes of the unusually long recovery. Earth, Planets and Space. 53, 993 (2001).
https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351696
I.G. Usoskin, H. Kananen, K. Mursula, P. Tanskanen, G.A. Kovaltsov. Correlative study of solar activity and cosmic ray intensity. J. Geophys. Res. 103 9567 (1998).
https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA03782
V.K. Mishra, A.P. Mishra. Long-term modulation of cosmic-ray intensityand correlation analysis using solar and heliospheric parameters. Sol. Phys. 293, 141 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1357-7
D.F. Webb, T.A. Howard. Coronal mass ejections: Observations. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 9, 3 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2012-3
M. Lee, L. Fisk. The role of particle drifts in solar modulation. Astrophys. J. 248, 836 (1981).
https://doi.org/10.1086/159208
E. Ross, W.J. Chaplin. The behaviour of galactic cosmicray intensity during solar activity cycle 24. Sol. Phys. 294, (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1397-7
R.P. Kane. Hysteresis loops of cosmic ray intensity decreases versus solar and interplanetary parameters. Ann. Geophys. 25, 2087 (2007).
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2087-2007
L. Burlaga, F. McDonald, M. Goldstein, A. Lazarus. Cosmic-ray modulation and turbulent interactionregions near 11 AU. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 12027 (1985).
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA12p12027
B. Popielawska. Components of the 11- and 22-year variation of cosmic rays. Planet Space Sci. 40, 811 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(92)90109-2
G. Brown, W. Williams. Some properties of the day-to-day variability of Sq(H). Planet. Sp. Sci. 17, 455 (1969).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Agreement
License to Publish the Paper
Kyiv, Ukraine
The corresponding author and the co-authors (hereon referred to as the Author(s)) of the paper being submitted to the Ukrainian Journal of Physics (hereon referred to as the Paper) from one side and the Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, represented by its Director (hereon referred to as the Publisher) from the other side have come to the following Agreement:
1. Subject of the Agreement.
The Author(s) grant(s) the Publisher the free non-exclusive right to use the Paper (of scientific, technical, or any other content) according to the terms and conditions defined by this Agreement.
2. The ways of using the Paper.
2.1. The Author(s) grant(s) the Publisher the right to use the Paper as follows.
2.1.1. To publish the Paper in the Ukrainian Journal of Physics (hereon referred to as the Journal) in original language and translated into English (the copy of the Paper approved by the Author(s) and the Publisher and accepted for publication is a constitutive part of this License Agreement).
2.1.2. To edit, adapt, and correct the Paper by approval of the Author(s).
2.1.3. To translate the Paper in the case when the Paper is written in a language different from that adopted in the Journal.
2.2. If the Author(s) has(ve) an intent to use the Paper in any other way, e.g., to publish the translated version of the Paper (except for the case defined by Section 2.1.3 of this Agreement), to post the full Paper or any its part on the web, to publish the Paper in any other editions, to include the Paper or any its part in other collections, anthologies, encyclopaedias, etc., the Author(s) should get a written permission from the Publisher.
3. License territory.
The Author(s) grant(s) the Publisher the right to use the Paper as regulated by sections 2.1.1–2.1.3 of this Agreement on the territory of Ukraine and to distribute the Paper as indispensable part of the Journal on the territory of Ukraine and other countries by means of subscription, sales, and free transfer to a third party.
4. Duration.
4.1. This Agreement is valid starting from the date of signature and acts for the entire period of the existence of the Journal.
5. Loyalty.
5.1. The Author(s) warrant(s) the Publisher that:
– he/she is the true author (co-author) of the Paper;
– copyright on the Paper was not transferred to any other party;
– the Paper has never been published before and will not be published in any other media before it is published by the Publisher (see also section 2.2);
– the Author(s) do(es) not violate any intellectual property right of other parties. If the Paper includes some materials of other parties, except for citations whose length is regulated by the scientific, informational, or critical character of the Paper, the use of such materials is in compliance with the regulations of the international law and the law of Ukraine.
6. Requisites and signatures of the Parties.
Publisher: Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Address: Ukraine, Kyiv, Metrolohichna Str. 14-b.
Author: Electronic signature on behalf and with endorsement of all co-authors.