Nuclear Excitation by Electron Transition

  • A. Ya. Dzyublik Institute for Nuclear Research, Nat. Acad. of Sci. of Ukraine
Keywords: nuclear isomers, Hf, NEET, induced nuclear decay, x-rays

Abstract

A theory of the nuclear excitation by an electron transition (NEET) induced by x-rays is developed on the basis of the strict collision theory. All stages of the process are considered, including the formation of a hole in an inner electronic shell, its decay leading to the excitation of the nucleus, as well as the subsequent filling of the upper level vacancy and the deexcitation of the nucleus. The cross sections are calculated for NEET and the photoabsorption of x-rays near the absorption edge. The results agree with the data of Kishimoto et al. for NEET on 197Au. In addition, we discuss the NEET mechanism of triggering of the 31-year isomer 178Hfm2 via an intermediate level induced by x-rays. We have shown that the 2% decay acceleration of this isomer declared by Collins et al. is realistic if the nucleus attributes a triaxial shape in the intermediate state, and there exists an additional rotational band with the 13^- level.

References


  1. M. Morita, Progr. Theor. Phys. 49, 1574 (1973).
     https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.49.1574

  2. S. Kishimoto, Y. Yoda, Y. Kobayashi et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 031301(R) (2006).

  3. K. Otozai, R. Arakawa, and T. Saito, Nucl. Phys. A 297, 97 (1978).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(78)90200-2

  4. A. Shinohara, T. Saito, M. Shoi et al., Nucl. Phys. A 472, 151 (1987).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(87)90225-9

  5. L. Lakosi, N.C. Tam, and I. Pavliczek, Phys. Rev. C 52, 1510 (1995).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.52.1510

  6. I. Ahmad, R.W. Dunford, H. Esbensen et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 051304 (2000).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.051304

  7. T. Saito, A. Shiohara, and K. Otozai, Phys. Lett. B 92, 293 (1980).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90267-1

  8. Z. Chummei, Nucl. Data Sheets 62, 433 (1991).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3752(91)80018-2

  9. V. Kirischuk, A. Savrasov, N. Strilchuk, and V. Zheltonozhsky, EPL 97, 32001 (2012).
     https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/97/32001

  10. E.V. Tkalya, Nucl. Phys. A 539, 209 (1992).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(92)90267-N

  11. Y. Ho et al., Phys. Rev. C 48, 2277 (1993).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.48.2277

  12. M.R. Harston, Nucl. Phys. A 690, 447 (2001).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00358-X

  13. E.V. Tkalya, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022509 (2007).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022509

  14. A.Ya. Dzyublik, JETP Lett. 93, 489 (2011).
     https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364011090050

  15. M.L. Goldberger and K.M. Watson, Collision Theory (Wiley, New York, 1964).

  16. A.Ya. Dzyublik, Sov. J. Theor. Math. Phys. 87, 393 (1991).
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016579

  17. A.S. Davydov, Excited States of Atomic Nuclei (Atomizdat, Moscow, 1967) (in Russian).

  18. C.B. Collins, N.C. Zoita, F. Davanloo et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71, 619 (2004).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.033

  19. C.B. Collins, F. Davanloo, M.C. Iosif et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 695 (1999.
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.695

  20. C.B. Collins, F. Davanloo, M.C. Iosif et al., Laser Phys. 9, 1 (1999).

  21. C.B. Collins, F. Davanloo, A.C. Rusu et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 054305 (2000).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.054305

  22. C.B. Collins, F. Davanloo, N.C. Zoita et al., Hyperf. Interact. 135, 51 (2001).
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013959015577

  23. C.B. Collins, N.C. Zoita, A.C. Rusu et al., Europhys. Lett. 57, 677 (2002).
     https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2002-00516-1

  24. S. Olariu and A. Olariu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2541 (2000).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2541

  25. D.P. McNabb et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2542 (2000).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2542

  26. P. Neumann-Cosel and A. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2543 (2000).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2543

  27. E.V. Tkalya, Phys. Usp. 45, 525 (2005).
     https://doi.org/10.1070/PU2005v048n05ABEH002190

  28. A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, v. 1 (Benjamin, New York, 1969).

  29. E.V. Tkalya, Phys. Rev. C 68, 064611 (2003).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.064611

  30. M.R. Harston and J.J. Carroll, Laser Phys. 15, 487 (2005).

  31. I. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 024311 (2005).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.024311

  32. J.J. Carroll, S.A. Karamian, R. Propri et al., Phys. Lett. B 679, 203 (2009).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.025

  33. J.A. Bearden and A.F. Burr, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 125 (1967).
     https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.39.125


Published
2018-10-10
How to Cite
Dzyublik, A. (2018). Nuclear Excitation by Electron Transition. Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 58(7), 618. https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe58.07.0618
Section
Nuclei and nuclear reactions