Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Plasmas as a Testbed for Non-Equilibrium Plasma Modeling in High-Energy Physics Applications

Authors

  • N. Gomidze Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University
  • D. Jakobia Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University
  • M. Khajidhvili Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University
  • L. Kalandadze Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University
  • I. Jabnidze Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University
  • K. Makharadze Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University
  • O. Nakashidze Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University
  • J. Shainidze Department of Physics, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe71.2.173

Keywords:

laser-induced plasma (LIP), Saha equation, Boltzmann plot, stochastic modeling, high-energy density physics, non-LTE plasma

Abstract

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) enables rapid elemental analysis and plasma diagnostics but suffers from limited quantitative accuracy due to the strong spatiotemporal nonuniformity of the laser-induced plasma and stochastic fluctuations in ionization-recombination kinetics. In this work, we develop and experimentally validate a deterministic–stochastic framework that couples classical rate equations with stochastic differential terms to capture shot-toshot plasma variability. The model, implemented through a first-order Runge–Kutta (RK1) scheme augmented by the Euler–Maruyama method, is quantitatively related to standard LIBS diagnostics: Stark broadening for electron density (ne), the LTE Saha equation for ionization balance, and Boltzmann plots for excitation temperature (Texc). Single-shot LIBS experiments using a 1064 nm, 7 ns Nd : YAG laser were performed on six metals (Al, Cu, brass, Pb, stainless steel, and Ti) under identical conditions. The measured spectra showed high reproducibility (intensity scatter <7%), and the extracted plasma parameters revealed consistent materialdependent trends: Al and stainless steel exhibited the highest ne (up to (7–9) × 1018 cm−3), whereas Cu and brass showed lower values (∼(2–3) × 1018 cm−3). Electron temperatures derived from the Saha equation reached 12–13 kK for high-ionization materials and <11 kK for low-ionization ones. The introduction of a stochastic fluctuation term (σ ≈ 0.05) reproduced the observed intensity scatter and improved agreement between modeled and experimental spectra. The proposed framework enhances LIBS diagnostic accuracy under transient, nonequilibrium conditions and provides a compact laboratory analogue for studying fluctuationdriven plasma dynamics relevant to high-energy-density physics, laser–plasma interactions, and fusion environments. This unified deterministic–stochastic treatment bridges applied laser spectroscopy with the broader physics of non-LTE plasmas.

References

1. H.R. Griem. Principles of plasma spectroscopy. Cambridge University 52, 5743 (1995).

2. L.J. Radziemski. Lasers-Induced Plasmas and Applications (1st ed.) (CRC Press, 1989).

3. R. Noll. Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications (2nd ed.) (Springer Nature, 2023).

4. H. Hou, Y. Tian, Y. Lu, Y. Li, R. Zheng. Temperature measurement of laser-induced plasmas from the intensity ratio of two lines emitted from different elements with the same ionization degree. Appl. Spectr. 68 (9), 1085 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1366/13-07350

5. L. Yang, X. Tan, X. Wan, L. Chen, D. Jin, M. Qian, G. Li. Stark broadening for diagnostics of the electron density in non-equilibrium plasma utilizing isotope hydrogen alpha lines. J. Appl. Phys. 115 (16), 163106 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4873960

6. J. Zeng, A. Deng, C. Gao, Y. Hou, J. Yuan. Extended chemical picture of ionization balance to extremely dense plasmas. Phys. Rev. E 111 (1), 015211 (2025).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.111.015211

7. N. Gomidze, M. Khajishvili, K. Makharadze, I. Jabnidze, Z. Surmanidze. About statistical moments of scattered laser radiation from random phase screen. Inter. J. Emerging Techn. Adv. Engin. 6 (4), 237 (2016).

8. N. Gomidze, I, Jabnidze, K. Makharadze. Numerical experiments for the purpose of studying space-time evolution of various forms of pulse signals in the collisional cold plasma. Inter. J. Phys. Math.l Sci. 11 (8), 347 (2017).

9. Z. Davitadze, N. Gomidze, K. Makharadze. Control Laser Spectrofluorimeter with Microcontrollers. Adv. Mater. Res. 590, 201 (2012).

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.590.201

10. N. Gomidze, I. Jabnidze, K. Makharadze, M. Khajishvili, Z. Shashikadze, Z. Surmanidze. Numerical analyses of fluorescence characteristics of watery media via laser spectroscopy method. Mach. Technol. Mater. 2018 (5), 279 (2012).

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.590.206

11. N. Gomidze, J. Shainidze, R. Turmanidze. To the problems of fluorescence excitation spectrums. Machines. Technol. Mater. 2018 (5), 279 (2018).

12. L. Quackatz, A. Griesche, T. Kannengiesser. Spatially resolved EDS, XRF and LIBS measurements of the chemical composition of duplex stainless steel welds: A comparison of methods. Spectroch. Acta Part B: Atomic Spectr. 193, 106439 (2022).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2022.106439

13. P.B. Hansen, S. Schr¨oder, S. Kubitza, K. Rammelkamp, D.S. Vogt, H.-W. H¨ubers. Modeling of time-resolved LIBS spectra obtained in Martian atmospheric conditions with a stationary plasma approach. Spectroch. Acta Part B: Atomic Spectr. 178, 106115 (2021).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2021.106115

14. J.P. Goedbloed, R. Keppens, S. Poedts. Magnetohydrodynamics of Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas (Cambridge University Press, 2019).

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316403679

15. E. Esarey, C.B. Schroeder, W.P. Leemans. Physics of laserdriven plasma-based electron accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (3), 1229 (2009).

https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229

16. A. Pukhov, N.E. Andreev, A.A. Golovanov, I.I. Artemenko, I.Y. Kostyukov. Laser-plasma wake velocity control by multi-mode beatwave excitation in a channel.Plasma 6 (1), 29 (2023).

https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma6010003

17. N.E. Andreev, L.M. Gorbunov, R.R. Ramazashvili. Theory of a three-dimensional plasma wave excited by a highintensity laser pulse in an underdense plasma. Plasma Phys. Rep. 23 (4), 277 (1997).

18. P.E. Kloeden, E. Platen. Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations (Springer Science & Business Media, 1999).

19. L. Rajaˇci'c, N.V. Nedi'c, D. Doji'c, M. Skoˇci'c, S. Bukvi'c. Saha-Boltzmann method in plasma diagnostics: What can we obtain from a strict approach? J. Quant. Spectr. Rad. Transfer 333, 109338 (2024).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109338

20. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Theory and Applications. Edited by S. Musazzi, U. Perini (Springer, 2014).

21. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Edited by J.R. Rumble. (CRC Press, 2018). https://hbcp.chemnetbase.com.

22. S.S. Harilal, G.V. Miloshevsky, P.K. Diwakar, N.L. LaHaye, A. Hassanein. Experimental and computational study of complex shockwave dynamics in laser ablation plumes in argon atmosphere. Physics of Plasmas 19 (8), 083504 (2012).

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4745867

23. A. Kramida, Yu. Ralchenko, J. Reader, & NIST ASD Team (ver. 5.12). NIST Atomic Spectra Database. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://physics.nist.gov/asd.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

Issue

Section

Plasma physics

How to Cite

Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Plasmas as a Testbed for Non-Equilibrium Plasma Modeling in High-Energy Physics Applications. (2026). Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 71(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe71.2.173

Most read articles by the same author(s)